Archived entries for tech

Garden Update #4

One of the sunflowers has finally bloomed, and the tomatoes look ready-to-pick! I feel a little guilty about the idea of eating the tomatoes. I’ve been raising them like children for months, and now they’re going to end up in a sandwich…just seems wrong. Maybe I’ll let them live a day or two longer. Maybe the fact that I’m photographing and speaking about tomatoes like children is a problem in itself, but we’ll just ignore that :)

I brought out the D90 to document this very momentous occasion:

And it started from some birdseed dropped in a planter.

And it started from some birdseed dropped in a planter.

Yummy.

Yummy.

Garden Update #3

It’s been a month since I posted garden photos, and things have changed pretty dramatically. Progress is speeding up a lot right now in the heat wave – I may be dying of heatstroke, but at least the plants like it. The sunflowers are taller than me and starting to flower, and the tomatoes are finally turning yellowish!

Finally, they're no longer totally green. I was starting to worry.

Finally, they're no longer totally green. I was starting to worry.

Sunflowers are just starting to bud.

Sunflowers are just starting to bud.

The sunflowers suddenly got really tall.

The sunflowers suddenly got really tall!

Garden Update #2

I’m documenting the progress of my tomatoes and sunflowers – mostly for my own entertainment. Here’s some pictures I took of them today with my iPhone, 6 days after the last ones I took.

Tomatoes 1< /br>

Sunflowers

Welcome, summer.

It was the first day of summer yesterday, and although it was raining on and off, the flowers in the backyard smelled wonderful and I was filled with hope that summer’s here despite the lack of tanning weather this week. I took a few photos of the backyard garden to celebrate…well, it’s not a garden so much as a collection of plants in pots, but you work with what you have (in this case, a suburban townhouse). I have a habit of killing plants, so I’m pretty proud of the garden’s progress so far:

I think these are geraniums. Theyre pink and theyre growing, so I dont really care what they are.

I think these are geraniums. They're pink and they're growing, so I don't really care what they are.

These sunflower sprouts grew from birdseed that fell into the planter. Coincidences like that make me happy :-)

These sunflower sprouts grew from birdseed that fell into the planter. Coincidences like that make me happy :-)

More sunflower sprouts

More sunflower sprouts

I have high hopes for these tomatoes. I hope a deer or squirrel wont eat them for lunch before I get to.

I have high hopes for these tomatoes. I hope a deer or squirrel won't eat them for lunch before I get to.

More tomatoes.

More tomatoes.

A pretty dark pink flower.

A pretty dark pink flower.

Closeup with water drops.

Closeup with water drops.

More water drops on a white flower.

More water drops on a white flower.

Please Select Operating System – We Won’t Judge You…

I really don’t have anything major against Windows – I just like Mac a lot better. And buttons like these can’t help but amuse me:

Mac vs Windows

5 Easy Tutorials for Creating Web 2.0-Style Buttons

Love it or hate it, the “Web 2.0″ look is everywhere these days, and if you are in the design or web line of work, you may find yourself wanting to (or having no choice to) create them at some point. I’ve collected a few tutorials that I think are worthwhile and fairly quick and easy on making Web 2.0-style buttons and shapes. I tried to stay away from Illustrator ones that inlcude a lot of transparencies – they gum up your file and can make it a nightmare to work with. So, without further ado:

1. Tutorial: How to create a shiny Web 2.0 button in Illustrator (graphics-illustrations)

Quick and easy with a nice result that can easily have other graphics added to the button area.

picture-4

2. Shiny Buttons Without Blends or Transparencies in Illustrator (VecTips)

Another simple Illustrator tutorial, this time for rectangular buttons or shapes.

picture-2


3. Web 2.0 style buttons (Iris Design)

A similar effect as the above tutorial, but with a slightly different look, and this time for Photoshop.

picture-5


4. Design a Glossy Download Icon (PSD Tuts)

A slightly more complex tutorial for Photoshop, but with a great result.

picture-6


5. How-to Create a Web 2.0 button/icon (All4YourWebsite)

A really quick-to-make square button for Photoshop.

picture-7


Hope these are useful to you!

Wordpress is everywhere!

I installed the free Wordpress for iPhone app, which lets you post/edit your Wordpress blog posts wherever you may find yourself – I’m testing it out right now on my morning commute (no, don’t worry, I’m on the Skytrain, not endangering the public by texting-and-driving). I think this app lets you add pictures as well, but I’m almost at work, so I will try it out another time. You can read more about the latest version of the Wordpress app at the Wordpress website. Happy Monday interweb people.

Edit: Hm, seems to be a problem with the date settings in the app, as this post showed up as having been written on March 20. I had to correct it to March 23 on my Macbook – I’ll  look into that.

SNL Dateline Ringtone

I love Bill Hader’s “Dateline” SNL sketches (“Dateline investigates Real Life Crimes and Bad Situations” and I really wanted a ringtone of it – I couldn’t find any so I made one. The sound quality isn’t great but it’s still golden in my opinion. It’s in mp3 format so you can easily turn it into a ringtone using the appropriate software – for iPhone, open the clip in Garageband (Mac), then select Share>Send Ringtone to iTunes – or try Aukido for Windows.

SNL Dateline Ringtone.mp3

(right click the above link and select “Save Link As” or “Save Target”)

No-brainer guide to setting up your Blu-Ray player

Greetings everyone – I hope you had a happy and safe time over the holidays ( I did, minus the delayed flights and freak west coast snow storms, thanks for asking). I also hope you were bestowed with some awesome goodies from Santa or whoever else you threatened into getting you a brand new [insert name of shiny gadget here].

My boyfriend Cory and I decided not to buy each other gifts this year – our reasoning was that we’d rather buy a joint gift for ourselves on Boxing Day and save a large amount of cash. It’s not warm and fuzzy…but we ended up with a Blu-Ray player and some other cool stuff for approximately half the price, so who really cares?

I was extremely excited about our new Blu-Ray player. I couldn’t wait to get home and fire it up and be blown away by the crystal clear picture and sound! However, what they don’t tell you when you buy a Blu-Ray player is that there is a lot of other factors involved besides just plugging it in. To make matters worse, everyone you talk to seems to think that they are the ultimate knowledge source on all things Blu-Ray, and tend to leave you angry, confused, sad, and no closer to your beautiful home-theatre experience (especially if that person is a Future Shop employee…don’t even get me started).

Here are some of the things you may hear while trying to set up your Blu-Ray player that you should not believe, and how you can get yourself setup without too much headache or emptied wallets. I hope my journey can be of help to you.

#1: There’s no point getting Blu-Ray if you don’t have a 1080p TV!

Wrong. While 1080p is the “holy grail” of high definition TV, you can still get an awesome result if you have a TV that only has 1080i. A quick summary of the differences: 1080i (the “i” stands for interlaced) puts the picture on your screen by first displaying the odd-numbered columns of pixels, then the even, to create a complete 540 pixel wide picture. All this happens every 1/30th of a second. With 1080p (or progressive), the whole picture is sent all at once. In theory, 1080p will result in smoother motion and less jagged edges between colors. If you want to get further into it, there’s a good article here that will help you out.

From the research I’ve done and my experience with our plain ol’ 1080i TV, you’re not really going to notice the difference. Yes, you may get a slight increase in quality with 1080p, but since most Blu-Ray players output full 1080p and this is converted (either through the player or your 1080i TV, depending what their capabilities are) to 1080i, the difference is probably going to be so slight that I can pretty much guarantee you’re still going to get a great result.

#2 You need an HDMI cable that costs more money than you make in a week.

If you’ve got a Blu-Ray player and HD TV, you probably are going to want to get an HDMI cable to connect the two. HDMI is a true digital connection that gives the best possible quality. Please don’t listen if someone tells you you need to buy a really expensive HDMI cable. Unless you have the extra cash and you really want to get the cable that costs more than the Blu-Ray player did, just get a cheaper one.

Yes, the guys at the electronics store will try to convince you that you need it, but here’s the thing: all short HDMI cables are essentially the same except for slight differences that you probably won’t be able to notice. The only reason you’d want to spend more on a really high-end one is if your TV is more than a couple metres away from your player – as the cable gets longer, quality will eventually start to deteriorate.

There’s a range of very inexpensive cables (around $30) that are made for regular DVD players and HD cable boxes that may not get you the depth of color you want with your Blu-Ray movies (Blu-Ray uses something called “deep color” to get the high-quality picture it produces – read more about it here).

Then there’s another bunch of cables that are cost around $50-$80. I suggest going for one of these. The one I bought works great and the picture looks amazing. Just get one that is gold-plated if you can – from what I hear, non gold-plated ones can rust over time and even damage your TV and Blu-Ray player’s connectors.

Then there’s the most expensive cables that will run you from $100 to over $250. Ah! How can one cable be $50 and one be $250? Take a look at the brand  – all of the really pricey cables are made by Monster. From what I’ve heard, Monster overprices their cables pretty badly for what you get. The difference in quality with these cables is that you will get a little more picture detail in dark areas of the picture…but again, the difference is very slight and in my opinion, certainly not worth an extra $200.

If you’re really stapped for cash, we got good results just using our component cable (the ones with red, green and blue plugs) before we bought the HDMI one. The difference IS noticeable – you won’t get the really crisp details in the picture – but it still beats a regular DVD by a long shot until you can pick up an HDMI cable.

#3: Now that I’m used to Blu-Ray quality, my massive DVD collection is now inferior and obsolete.

This is actually something I said to myself, not something I heard from someone else. However, it’s not altogether true. While Blu-Rays DO look and sound amazing, most Blu-Ray players do a pretty good job of up-converting normal DVDs to 1080i/p quality. If you have a large DVD collection that you’ve put a considerable amount of money into over the years, this is good news. I tried out a regular DVD (X-Men, if you want to know) the other day and the difference was quite significant. Since Blu-Ray discs currently cost around $30 for a new release, replacing your entire collection of DVDs would be borderline insane. On top of the cost, while older movies are going to look good on Blu-Ray, they won’t have quite as high of quality because they were produced before Blu-Ray technology came along. Granted, these movies were shot for very large movie theater screens and will still translate to Blu-Ray fairly well, but from what I’ve seen so far, the older movies don’t have the same detail as current new releases. I suggest you start your Blu-Ray collection fresh and maybe just replace a few favorite DVDs with Blu-Ray if you want to.

I hope this has been helpful in one way another and that you can get yourself set up on your couch with some popcorn and your Blu-Ray movies sooner rather than later!

Crowdspring.com: A staggeringly off-balance approach to visual design

Lately I’ve been spending a little too much time on the (fairly) newly launched Crowdspring.com. The site allows people to post creative projects, requesting designs and concepts for everything from logos to photography to entire websites. Hopeful designers can then submit their designs in hopes of coming out the “winner” and getting some cash. Basically what the site comes down to is asking designers to  “design on spec” or essentially work for free with no guarantee of getting paid. This is something that most self-respecting designers stay away from. I’ve applied for a couple of different jobs that requested that the prospective employee submit a design with their application based on some specific criteria. As soon as I see anything like this in the job description, I drop it like it’s hot. For one, I’m being asked to take up a large amount of my time to create something that will just “hopefully” meet the employers expectations and get me an interview. I’m a professional and my time is very valuable to me. Secondly, I’ve already submitted what I think is a pretty stellar portfolio full of many years worth of design work for the employer to peruse. Imagine this: you want to hire a carpenter to build you a house, but you first ask him to build you a garage to see if he’s good enough – even though he already has plenty of great recommendations and you’ve seen all the fantastic houses he’s built in the past. Is he going to do it? No. He’s going to tell you, probably in much more colourful language, to take a walk.

So if I’m so against designing on spec, why have I been spending so much time on Crowdspring.com that asks designers to do just that? One thing that got me to take a closer look is the simplicity of the site’s design. “Buyers”, or people who are posting projects, have to deposit the money they will pay the winning designer before the project is posted. They also must agree to choose a winner after the project’s time expires – so there’s no room for the buyer to back out. The designer who wins is guaranteed to get their money. The site is easy to navigate and has an attractive Web 2.0-ish look. But the main thing that got me interested was the fact that a lot of the designs submitted were really terrible, and I’m speaking from a completely objective point of view. A lot of the logos submitted were sloppy and unclear in their message, and I got tempted. What would it hurt to whip up a few logos? The money paid to winning designers is fairly decent (the average payout is around $250-$300). If I spent 30 minutes on a logo and actually won, that would be some easy money! So I admit it, I did submit some logos to a few different projects. And I was CONVINCED that I would win. I even wrote nice succint little creative briefs to accompany each submission. My logos were strong, simple, and sophisticated. I waited for money to roll in…and waited…and I’m still waiting. Nope I haven’t been picked yet. And I’m pretty much done with Crowdspring.com.

And no, I’m truly not writing it off because my designs didn’t get chosen. If anything, that fact made me even more eager to try to step it up and best the competition. But at this point, I’ve probably spent a good three hours total working for absolutely nothing – and so have the other 95% of people who submit designs to the site and don’t get picked.

There’s something wrong here. Part of being a designer is having the ability to work with your client and come up with something that truly fits their needs. We don’t just make pictures, we solve problems and help our clients see what will work best for them. Just because a client likes blue and orange stripes or rabbits, it doesn’t mean that their logo should be a rabbit with bright blue-and-orange racing stripes. An essential step to creating a good logo (or any piece of design), is sitting down with the client and explaining why we did what we did any why the racing stripes don’t communicate what their business is about in the best possible way.

So is Crowdspring.com a good thing in any way for buyers or designers? From what I’ve seen on several of the site’s projects, designers have posted a logo, the buyer has commented back on it requesting a different, image/colour, etc, and the designer changes it to suit what the buyer wants. It sounds good in theory, but since it makes sense that the designer just wants to “win” and get the money, they’re not likely to stop and say “wait…I don’t think that this image really represents the brand – I’m going to explain that to the buyer and suggest we use something else”. The site’s process cheapens the value of really good design and eliminates a large part of the designer’s skills – the essential need for communication and compromise. By the same token, the buyer doesn’t necessarily get the best logo for their business. Even though in their opinion they may have chosen the best possible option, they’ve missed out on a large part of what a good designer can do – not just drawing a picture, but creating a powerful and clear piece of visual communication.

Crowdspring (and other crowdsourcing sites like it) is radidly becoming a phenomenon – it’s been nominated for WiredBiz’s small business program contest and has a radidly growing number of members. At first glance it seems like a great idea – especially for the buyers who get to choose from a wide variety of design concepts. There’s the possibility that if you’re a designer and your concept gets chosen, you’ll have further opportunities to work with that buyer in the future. If you get first place in a few projects, you’ve got a little extra cash in your pocket.

So I guess what it really comes down to is what you want as a buyer or designer. If you’re a designer and you want to spend time doing work without any guarantee you’ll get something back, that’s entirely up to you. If you’re a buyer and want a broad range of options to choose from and the ability to fine-tune designs without much objection from the designer, that’s also your choice. All I suggest is that you think about all your options before you use this site. Buyers, spend some time online looking at designer’s portfolios and see the work they’ve already done. There’s some amazing talent out there and designers who will work with you to create something that’s perfect based on what your business really stands for, not just how you think the logo should look. And designers, remember the example of the carpenter…do you really want to build the garage for free?



Copyright © 2004–2009. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed. This blog is proudly powered by Wordpress and uses Modern Clix, a theme by Rodrigo Galindez.